The New Earth Archive has a list of 70 books that help us think our way through the future that every educated person concerned with our fate is encouraged to read. Though his book is a novel, Charles Stoss’s Accelerando should be at the top of that list. Perhaps even, at the very top.
I picked up a copy of Accelerando after I heard an interview with Venor Vinge, one of the founders of the Singularity Movement, who praised the work as one of the few examples of fiction that tried to peer behind the dark veil of the singularity. I had originally intended to do a review of Accelernado all in one post, but then realized how much it made my head hurt, but in a good way. I figured that I might make my readers’ heads hurt in the same way if I tried to explain the book all in one go. Accelerando is so bizarre, profound, and complex that it needs to be described in digestible doses, the same way I found myself wrestling with the novel. To take it all on in one post is a fool’s errand.
What follows below then is a general sketch of the plot of Accelerando. I then dive into what I think are some very important things Stross has to say about our current economic model through the medium of his novel. In a future post I’ll try to tackle something even more important he takes on in the book- the nature and evolution of technological civilization, and the fate of the human species.
The plot of the novel centers- around the story of four generations of the Macx clan: Manfred, Amber, Sirhan, and Manni. All of the Macx’s are befriended/manipulated by the robotic cat, Aienko, who plays a central role in the story. The book begins with Manfred Macx, a kind of Julian Assange/George Soros who is hated by almost everybody- especially tax hungry IRS agents and his ex-wife, Pamela, (who happen to be one of the same) for giving his brilliant ideas away for free.
Manfred is an example of a type of human being Stross sees just over the horizon, constantly plugged-in, with so much of his self offloaded into the cloud, that he loses his identity the minute his” glasses”, which are his interface with net, are stolen.
He is also a new type of political figure managing to revive a form of communism by creating a centralized-planning algorithm that can interface with market based systems. At the same time he is a pioneer in granting rights to increasingly sentient emergent AIs of whom a group of uploaded lobsters originally created by the KGB can be counted.
If Manfred represents the first stage of the singularity, the stage we can now be said to be in, and are therefore somewhat familiar, his daughter Amber represents the stage that follows. Purposefully enslaving herself on a slave ship on a mission to mine a moon of Jupiter, Amber eventually sets up a “kingdom” on a small asteroid. At this point the story becomes fantastical. The line between the real and the virtual essentially disappears, persons at this stage are able to split themselves into virtual “ghosts”, and Amber and her crew eventually set off in a star-ship the size of a Coke can, the crew able to embed themselves in its virtual world. Their destination is the source of alien messages some three light years away from Jupiter. What they discover are a particularly intelligent and ravenous group of space lobsters, who Manfred had liberated from the KGB years before, who exist as scavengers upon a civilization that has collapsed under the weight of their own singularity- more on the latter in a moment.
When the “virtual” Amber returns from her space mission she finds that the “real” Amber has married and had a child, named Sirhan, with Sadeq- the fundamentalist Muslim theologian who had come to the Jupiter system to bring the word of Muhammad to the aliens beyond the solar system, and found himself, instead, caught up in the legal struggles between Amber and her mother, Pamela. The site of their empire now centers around Saturn.
What Amber and her crew discovered on their trip to the alien router outside the solar system was a dark fact about the singularity. Many, indeed most, civilizations that reach the stage of singularity collapse, having consumed itself along with the original wet-ware species that had given it birth. What is left, or passersby, huddling closely to their parent star- a closed network.
Knowing this is their likely fate Amber, and her family, launch a political party the Accelerationista that is pushing a referendum to flee into the Milky Way from the “Vile Offspring” that have been created in the singularity, have consumed the inner planets in their quest for energy and processor space, and will soon consume what is left of the earth. The Accelerationista lose the election to the conservative party who prefer to stay put, but Amber and her family still manage to get a large number of people to make a break for it with the help of the space lobsters. In exchange the lobsters want to send a cohort of humans, including a version of Manfred off to explore a strange cloud that appears to be another version of the singularity out in the further depths of the universe
It’s a wild plot, but not as mind blowing as the deep philosophical questions Stross is raising with the world he has envisioned.
Right off the bat there’s the issue of economics, and here Stross attempted to bring to our attention problems that were largely off the public radar in 2005, but hold us in their grip today.
The protagonist of the story, Manfred Macx, doesn’t believe in the profit economy anymore. He gives his ideas away for free, and indeed Stross himself seemed to be following this philosophy, releasing the novel under a Creative Commons license. In the novel copyright comes under the “protection” of mafias that will break your legs if you infringe on their copyright as they threaten to do to Manfred for giving away the musical legacy of the 20th century, again, for free. This battle between traditional copyright holders and the “sharing” economy has only become more acute since Stross published his novel, think SISPA and beyond.
Manfred’s attitude to money drives both the US government (and his ex-wife) crazy. America is creaking under the weight of its debt as the baby boom generation retires en mass, but stubbornly refuses to die. Since Accelerando was published debt politics and the consequences of demographic decline have come to the forefront of political debate in the US, but especially in Europe. One thing Stoss got definitively wrong, or better probably will have gotten wrong, is that he imagines a strong European supra-state in our near-future. From our current angle it seems hard to imagine how even the relatively weak union Europe has now will survive the current crisis.
Stross also seems to be criticizing, or at least bringing to our attention, the hyper-innovative nature of financial instruments and legal contracts and doing this several years before the financial crisis of 2008 made financial exotica like Credit Default Swaps household terms. For, it is precisely in this world of virtual finance and “creative” law where Manfred excels at being innovative. Manfred may be like Julian Asange in his nomadic lifestyle, and revolutionary ideology, which manages to piss-off just above everyone, but in other ways he resembles George Soros in that many of his best innovations are the result of Soros-like arbitrage, exploiting the gaps between reality and expectation and especially the differences between states. Manfred displays this skill when he frees his daughter Amber from her mother by having Amber sell herself into slavery to a company based in Yemen, where her slave owner will trump the custody rights of her mother.
Stross also plays with the idea of how crazy the world of virtual trading, and image management on platforms such as FaceBook have become, imagining bubbles and busts of bizarre bits of ether such as those traded in his “reputation market”.
Stross’s critique of capitalism may even run somewhat deeper for he has Manfred align himself with the old school communist Gianni to bring the command economy back from the dead using artificial intelligence able to link up with market mechanism- what exactly that means and would look like is really not all that clear, but that order is quickly superseded by another period of hyper-competition known as Economics 2.0
Indeed, this updated version of capitalism Stross portrays as the biggest threat to civilization as it approaches the singularity. Such hyper-capitalism built around “corporations” that are in reality artificial intelligences might not be a phenomenon of human begun civilization alone, Stross seems to be providing us with one possible explanation to Fermi’s Paradox – the silence of the universe seemingly so ripe for life. Civilizations that reach the singularity are often so ravenous for resources, including the intelligence of the very beings that sparked the singularity in the first place, that they cannibalize themselves, and end up huddled around their parent star with little desire to explore or communicate after collapse.
The fate Stross paints for Economy 2.0 societies reminded me of a quote by Hannah Arendt who interpreted the spirit of Western capitalism and imperialism in the desire of the arch-imperialist Cecil Rhodes to “annex the planets”, and Thomas Hobbes conception of human kind’s limitless lust for more and more power that became the core assumption of the modern age:
But when the last war has come and every man has been provided for, no ultimate peace is established on earth: the power accumulating machine, without which the continual expansion would not have been achieved needs more material to devour in its never ending process. If the last victorious Commonwealth cannot proceed to” annex the planets” it can only proceed to destroy itself in order to begin anew the never-ending process of power generation*
I will leave off here until next time…
*Origins of Totalitarianism, Imperialism, 147
You’ve sold me a copy, at least.
I’ve ordered a copy too. Also, clicking on your New Earth Archive link, I found another book “Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny” by Robert Wright that looks interesting. Have you looked into it?
Regarding Accelerando, there seems to be some similarity to Phillip Dick’s VALIS (Vast Active Living Intelligence System), Although Dick’s novel is more psychological than Accelerando seems to be, there is in both some sort of living machine with intelligence far beyond human.
I look forward to your follow-up post.
Robert Wright is a strange cat. I actually have his more recent The Evolution of God sitting on my desk- though I haven’t cracked it open quite yet. If I remember from years back when I read Non-Zero, Wright’s thesis is that market transactions are an example of Non-Zero sum games. Both the seller and the buyer benefit as opposed to the standard zero-sum games- such as war- where there is a clear winner and loser.
His points is that, since the Enlightenment, the world has been taken up more and more by Non-Zero sum games, a development someone from the 19th century might call Providence. I am pretty sure The Evolution of God will build on that. Wright is currently a writer for the Atlantic Monthly and is always interesting.
Stross was definitely borrowing from P.K. Dick, who I need to read more of, but a fellow blogger of ours reminded me that Stoss’s train of thought stretches back to the 19th century and the Erewhon. I encourage you to check it out:
This sounds like an interesting book! I like books that “make the head hurt”. And thank you for introducing me to the New Earth Archive…or maybe not my book list is going to grow so much from that link =)
Thanks Frances, I wasn’t able to capture even a small part of Accelerando in that post, and have a part 2 planned for this weekend.
I know what you’re saying about your book list. I’d have to be immortal like the characters in Accelerando just to finish the list I have now ;>)
Very interesting. I like the idea of space lobsters. Salvador Dali would be thrilled.
I just picked up my copy, and saw it when it was still posted for free. Looking forward to delving into it!
[…] with galactic scale methods of destruction, or collapse into a singularity induced turtle shell, as imagined so cleverly by Charles Stross. We simply don’t know enough to actually decide one way or another, although in addition to the […]